Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2021-03-17 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's global score of 76.4. Samsung Galaxy A52's construction is way newer, but thicker and heavier than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a bit faster CPU than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and more 2200 MHz CPU cores.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel amount per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy A52 has a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same camera aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 also has a lot higher resolution back facing camera. The Galaxy A52 features longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 29 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.