Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2021-03-17 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's global score of 77.4. Even though the Galaxy A52 is a lot newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, it is notably thicker and notably heavier. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy A52 features just a bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 65% more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a lot larger camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality, a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light situations and a back-facing camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.