Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2021-03-17 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is better than the Moto Z2 Play, having a score of 90.7 against 77.4. Samsung Galaxy A52 is a way newer phone than Moto Z2 Play, although it is extremely thicker and much heavier. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a bit sharper screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a larger display, a little bit better pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A52 has just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a lot better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light images, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a much more mega pixels camera.
The Galaxy A52 has a superior battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 50% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.