Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2021-03-17 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is better than Moto Z3 Play, having a 90.7 score against 76.3. Even though Samsung Galaxy A52 is way newer than Moto Z3 Play, it is somewhat thicker and heavier. Galaxy A52 features a bit superior processing unit than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A52 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a slightly better looking display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a quite bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A52 counts with a superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 50% more battery size. Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.