Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| -- | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is better than the Motorola One Hyper, with a general score of 90.7 against 79.8. The Samsung Galaxy A52 design is newer, just a bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the Motorola One Hyper. The Galaxy A52 features a little faster processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A52 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy A52 features just a bit better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy A52 also has a little bit higher number of pixels per display inch and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Galaxy A52 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a camera with a 64 megapixels resolution, the Galaxy A52 also has a bigger aperture to take better low light images.
The Galaxy A52 has just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A52 also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 13% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.