Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a little bit better than Motorola razr (2020), with a general score of 90.7 against 87. Even though Samsung Galaxy A52 and Motorola razr (2020) were released with only 6 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A52 design is just a little thicker but also just a little bit lighter.
Motorola razr (2020) has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a little sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little more pixels per inch in the screen, a little bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Galaxy A52 features a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back and a larger back camera sensor shooting higher quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.