Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 405 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is much better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), having a 90.7 score against 79.2. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a lot better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller screen. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A52, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a very superior performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52, because it has a 4 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.