Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is much better than OPPO Find X3 Neo, having a 90.7 score against 76. Galaxy A52 is a just a little thicker and a little bit heavier device than the OPPO Find X3 Neo. OPPO Find X3 Neo features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52. They have a higher pixels number per display inch, a same size display and the same resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy A52 takes clearer photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The OPPO Find X3 Neo and Galaxy A52 feature very similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.