Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-17 | -- |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Plastic | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is much better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, with a score of 90.7 against 77. Although it's the best phone in this comparison review, the Galaxy A52 body is a little thicker and a little heavier than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52. Both have the same pixels density, a screen with the same size and the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a greater memory capacity for applications and games than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a bit better processor than Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has 6 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a really longer battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Galaxy A52 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, although it has a tinier camera aperture, they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.