Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| -- | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A52's 90.7 global score. Galaxy Fold's construction is somewhat thinner than the Galaxy A52, but it is notably heavier and was released just 18 months before. The Galaxy Fold features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Fold also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little more pixels per display inch. The Galaxy A52 takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 3% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.