Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M51's general score of 87.7. Even when the Galaxy A52 and Samsung Galaxy M51 were only released with a couple of months difference, the Galaxy A52 is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little higher display density.
The Samsung Galaxy M51's CPU is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A52's CPU, both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores. The Galaxy A52 counts with a little bit more storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the same camera aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also has a bigger sensor taking better quality photographs and videos.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.