Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| -- | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is a little bit better than the Galaxy A52, with a score of 90.8 against 90.7. Galaxy Note 20 is a just a bit heavier phone than the Galaxy A52, but they are equally thin. Galaxy Note 20 and Samsung Galaxy A52 count with extremely similar screens, because although the Galaxy Note 20 has a just a bit worse screen pixels density, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a little larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A52 also has a much more mega pixels back facing camera, higher 30 frames per second video frame rate and a larger camera sensor. The Galaxy A52 has just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.