Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A52's general score of 90.7. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is just a bit heavier but just a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A52, and both were released with only 7 months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A52, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a little bit bigger screen and a bit higher pixels quantity per screen inch. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a bit more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better camera than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot larger camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos and a much more MP back-facing camera.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a battery duration that is very similar to the Galaxy A52 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.