Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A52, with a global score of 93.6 against 90.7. The Galaxy S10 5G is an older and a bit heavier cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A52, but Samsung made it just a bit thinner anyway. The Galaxy S10 5G features a little bit better display than Galaxy A52, because it has a better 1440 x 3040 resolution, a just a bit greater pixels quantity per inch of display and a quite larger display.
The Galaxy S10 5G features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A52 counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 features a better camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or videos in poorly lited situations and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a much higher 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a battery lifetime that is very similar to the battery performance in Samsung Galaxy A52.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.