Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| -- | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, getting a 90.7 score against 89.7. The Galaxy A52 body is newer than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's, although it's a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. The Galaxy S10 Lite and Samsung Galaxy A52 feature extremely similar screens, because although the Galaxy S10 Lite has a just a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a little bit better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy S10 Lite features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy A52 and the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite have really similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.