Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-17 | -- |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.67 ounces | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A52's 90.7 general score. The Galaxy S25 Ultra body is noticeably thinner and a lot lighter than Galaxy A52. The Galaxy A52 has a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better looking display than Galaxy A52, because it has a just a little higher count of pixels in each display inch, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a little bigger screen. The Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A52, because it has a larger camera aperture, a camera with a much better 200 MP resolution, a much higher video quality and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy A52 has a greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a little longer battery life than Galaxy A52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.