Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-03-17 | -- |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is much better than the Galaxy S6 Active, having a 90.7 score against 80.9. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bits processor and an additional graphics processor.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has an incredibly better screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels number in each screen inch and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 96 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy A52 has improved battery performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A52 has a much better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures, a much bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality photos and videos and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.