Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is a bit better than Galaxy Z Flip 3, getting a 90.7 score against 85.6. Despite being the best in this review, the Galaxy A52 is a somewhat thicker and just a little heavier cellphone than the Galaxy Z Flip 3. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little better performance than Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A52, because it has a quite greater pixels density, a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a quite larger display. The Galaxy A52 counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. Samsung Galaxy A52 takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.