Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| -- | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is slightly better than Galaxy Z Fold 3's global score of 90.6. Even though the Galaxy A52 and Galaxy Z Fold 3 were released with only 5 months difference, Galaxy A52's design is extremely lighter but noticeably thicker. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixels density. Galaxy A52 captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger camera aperture and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 has a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.