Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| 2021-03-17 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is better than the Sony Xperia XZs, having a overall score of 90.7 against 77.2. The Galaxy A52 construction is incredibly newer, but just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Sony Xperia XZs. Xperia XZs features a screen that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A52 one, because although the Xperia XZs has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Xperia XZs, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 96 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a bit faster processor than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Xperia XZs shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A52, although it has a much less mega-pixels back-facing camera, a lot tinier sensor, a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and videos in low-light situations and a worse (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.