Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is better than Xperia Z4v, getting a 90.7 score against 78.8. The Galaxy A52 construction is newer and just a bit thinner than Xperia Z4v's, but it is somewhat heavier. The Sony Xperia Z4v features a better display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia Z4v, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Sony Xperia Z4v has a bit superior processor than Galaxy A52, because although it has less RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with an extra graphics processor.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much better camera than Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos, a back camera with way more megapixels and a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A52 features a really longer battery life than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.