| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Galaxy A52 is better than vivo X70 Pro, getting a general score of 90.7 against 78.3. The Galaxy A52 is an a little thicker and just a little bit heavier phone than the vivo X70 Pro. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X70 Pro and Galaxy A52 feature really similar screens, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a little bit lower 1080 x 2376 resolution and a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite larger display. Samsung Galaxy A52 and vivo X70 Pro feature incredibly similar cameras, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a worse video definition and a back camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a larger sensor providing a better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features more memory to install games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The vivo X70 Pro and Galaxy A52 have similar batteries, although the vivo X70 Pro has just 4450mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.