Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| -- | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, getting a 90.7 score against 82.9. Galaxy A52's design is newer, a bit thinner and a little lighter than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, a quite lower pixel number in each inch of screen and a quite smaller display.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A52 also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 has a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Galaxy A52 has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way higher 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.