Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Blasting black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, with a score of 90.7 against 90.1. Samsung Galaxy A52's construction is newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a just a little greater screen density and a little bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera, a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same sensor size and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has better 60 fps video frame rates.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.