Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2021-05-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| -- | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Black Shark 4's 88.3 global score. Galaxy A52 is a a bit lighter and somewhat thinner device than the Xiaomi Black Shark 4, although both of them were only released with a few months difference. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also counts with a little bit bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Black Shark 4's battery duration is very similar to the battery lifetime in Galaxy A52.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.