Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| -- | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| Plastic | Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A52's 90.7 overall score. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is a heavier device than the Samsung Galaxy A52, but they are equally thin. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a little bit bigger display and more pixels per inch of screen. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a tinier camera sensor, a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting images or videos in low-light situations and a back-facing camera with much less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher video quality.
Galaxy A52 has a better memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a little better battery duration than Galaxy A52, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.