Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| -- | Blue, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is much better than the Xiaomi Mi A3, having a global score of 90.7 against 79.2. Galaxy A52 is a a bit heavier device than the Xiaomi Mi A3, but both are 0.33inches thick. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 has a brighter display than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a greater display density and a quite bigger screen. Galaxy A52 shoots clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A52 also has a much more megapixels back camera and a lot larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.