Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Plastic | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's overall score of 82.4. Galaxy A52's construction is a little lighter but just a little thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and both of them were released only 0 months apart. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a little bigger screen.
Galaxy A52 has a much better storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A52. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a camera that is just as good as the Galaxy A52 one, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.