Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's 78.1 global score. Even being the best in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A52 construction is just a bit thicker and a little bit heavier than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra. The Galaxy A52 and the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra both count with very similar screens, because although the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a little worse display density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little larger screen.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has more RAM. Galaxy A52 counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a bit better camera than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video, they both have the same video resolution, a same resolution back facing camera and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 2 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.