Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is much better than the vivo X70 Pro, getting a 91.1 score against 78.3. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy A52s construction is a bit thicker and a bit heavier than vivo X70 Pro. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 operating system. Vivo X70 Pro has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a screen that is just as good as the Galaxy A52s one, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a quite lower display density, it also counts with a bit larger screen. The vivo X70 Pro's camera is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A52s's camera, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a lot less mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture.
Galaxy A52s features a bigger memory for applications and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1 TB. Vivo X70 Pro's battery duration is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A52s's battery life, although the vivo X70 Pro has just 4450mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.