Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-05-22 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a general score of 93.3, which is a lot better than Galaxy A6's general score of 75.8. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a a lot heavier phone than the Galaxy A6, but both of them are 0.3inches thick. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features an incredibly better screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a little bit bigger display, a way higher resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels and a way higher pixel number per inch in the display.
The iPhone 13 Pro features a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has 2 less cpu cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU and 3 GB more RAM. The iPhone 13 Pro shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a back camera with way less MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light situations and a much better video resolution.
IPhone 13 Pro has a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 3 percent more battery size.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone 13 Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A6, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.