Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Just black |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is a little bit better than the Galaxy A6, getting a score of 82.9 against 75.8. The Google Pixel 4a body is extremely newer and somewhat lighter, but also just a bit thicker than the Galaxy A6. Google Pixel 4a features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a lot more pixels per inch of screen, a way higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
Google Pixel 4a features a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 4a counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy A6, because it has 3140mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4a takes clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a back camera with a way worse 12.2 mega pixels resolution, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A6, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.