Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-20 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is a bit better than Galaxy A60, getting an 84.5 score against 82.3. Even though iPhone XS Max is older and heavier than the Galaxy A60, it's construction is still a little thinner. The iPhone XS Max has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has a quite better screen pixel density, a little bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1242 x 2688.
The Apple iPhone XS Max has a greater performance than Galaxy A60, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and less processing cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The Samsung Galaxy A60 has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A60 has just a bit longer battery performance than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity. Apple iPhone XS Max has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a lower (4K) video definition, a back-facing camera with lot less MP resolution and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking images or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.