Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-06-20 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 has a general score of 82.3, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 general score. The Galaxy A60 is a way newer cellphone, and it is also thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Motorola Droid Turbo. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A60 has the older 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional GPU. Motorola Droid Turbo features a much better screen than Galaxy A60, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
Motorola Droid Turbo and Samsung Galaxy A60 both count with very similar cameras, because although the Motorola Droid Turbo has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs or video in poorly lited situations and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, it also counts with a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy A60 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Droid Turbo has just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.