Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-20 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 is a little bit better than Moto Z4, with a score of 82.3 against 79.8. Despite being the best in this comparison review, it must be told that it's also a a bit heavier and a bit thicker device. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A60 has a more recent 11 version and Moto Z4 has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy A60 has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A60 also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the display. Moto Z4 has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Moto Z4 also has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A60 features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A60 also has 2 GB more RAM. The Motorola Moto Z4 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A60, because it has a 6% bigger battery capacity. The Moto Z4 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same aperture, the Moto Z4 also has a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.