Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-06-20 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A60's score of 82.3. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy A60, we must highlight that it is also a heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android OS, and Samsung Galaxy A60 has Android 11 OS.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A60. Both of them have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A60 and the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G count with very similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos and a lot more MP camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has much more memory for applications and games than Galaxy A60, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A90 5G has improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.