Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-06-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A60 is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 82.3 score against 77.8. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A60 has an older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Galaxy A60's body is extremely lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is notably thicker and was released 5 years before.
The Galaxy A60 features a much powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has a just a bit more pixels per display inch, a bigger screen and a much better 2200 x 2480 resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way bigger sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and videos, a way more megapixels back camera and a lot higher video resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A60, because it has 384 GB more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.