Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-06-20 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 is just a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, having a general score of 82.3 against 78.8. Even though the Galaxy A60 is older and just a little thicker than the vivo X60 Pro, it's design is still a bit lighter. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels number per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2376px and a bit larger display.
Vivo X60 Pro has a little bit better performance than Galaxy A60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Vivo X60 Pro features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels, a lot larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The vivo X60 Pro features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A60, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X60 Pro has longer battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.