Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-20 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a bit better than the Galaxy A60, getting a score of 85.5 against 82.3. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 body is older, just a bit heavier and thicker than the Galaxy A60. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A60, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A60, although it has a quite smaller screen, a quite lower pixel number in each inch of screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2246px. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB and 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a way less MP camera in the back, a lower (4K) video definition and a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images and video, it also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing better quality photographs and videos.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with improved battery life than Galaxy A60, because it has an 18% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.