Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-12-16 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), getting a score of 78.3 against 72.8. The vivo X70 Pro design is newer, but a bit heavier and a little thicker than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016). Vivo X70 Pro has a superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X70 Pro also has 9 GB more RAM.
Vivo X70 Pro features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a quite inferior count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2376 resolution. Vivo X70 Pro has a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The vivo X70 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and videos, a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution back camera and a way better video quality. Vivo X70 Pro counts with better battery life than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a 35 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.