Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is a bit better than Galaxy A7 (2017), getting a general score of 82.9 against 75.8. Google Pixel 4a's design is incredibly newer and lighter than Galaxy A7 (2017)'s, although it is a bit thicker. Google Pixel 4a has a little bit better screen than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a just a bit better pixels number per display inch, a little bit larger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Google Pixel 4a has a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 4a features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 4a counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a way less MP camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a way higher video definition. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) has a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.