Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG K92 is better than Galaxy A7 (2017), getting a general score of 85.4 against 75.8. LG K92's construction is a lot newer, but a bit heavier and a little thicker than the Galaxy A7 (2017). LG K92 features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG K92 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG K92 features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a larger display, a bit more pixels per display inch and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. LG K92 shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a lot higher (4K) video definition, a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The LG K92 counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 96 GB more internal memory and an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG K92 features just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.