Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2018-10-20 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2018) is a little bit better than the LG V20, having a general score of 84.2 against 77. The Galaxy A7 (2018) design has the same thickness than LG V20, but it's just a little lighter. The Galaxy A7 (2018) features a little better performance than LG V20, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG V20 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. LG V20's camera is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) one, because although the LG V20 has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and a way worse resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a 0.36 inches camera sensor, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video resolution.
The LG V20 has a slightly better memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a bit superior battery life than LG V20, because it has a 3% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.