Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-20 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a score of 84.2, which is slightly better than LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 score. Even when Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) and the LG V50 ThinQ were only released with a couple months difference, Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is just a little bit lighter and a bit thinner. The LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018). Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a little larger display, a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution and a better screen pixels density. The LG V50 ThinQ captures a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a lot less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a larger aperture.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 21% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.