Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-10-20 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2018) is much better than Motorola Droid Turbo, getting an 84.2 score against 76.4. The Galaxy A7 (2018) is a extremely newer device, and it's also notably thinner and a little bit lighter than the Motorola Droid Turbo. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has less RAM and 4 lesser processing cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB and 96 GB more internal storage.
Motorola Droid Turbo features improved battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has an 18% more battery capacity. Motorola Droid Turbo has a camera that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) one, because although the Motorola Droid Turbo has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures in low-light environments and a camera in the back with a worse resolution, it also counts with a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.