Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-10-20 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has an overall score of 84.2, which is a little bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) construction is a lot newer, a bit lighter and notably thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo. Motorola DROID Turbo features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a GPU. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a camera that is just as good as the Galaxy A7 (2018) one, because although the Motorola DROID Turbo has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photographs and video in low light situations and a back camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a lot better video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with much more storage for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola DROID Turbo features better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.