Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-20 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic indigo |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2018) is a little bit better than the Moto G Stylus, getting an 84.2 score against 79.7. Although Galaxy A7 (2018) is older than Moto G Stylus, it's construction is lighter and somewhat thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with just a bit better display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2220 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the display. Motorola Moto G Stylus features a better camera than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a camera with much more mega-pixels, a much bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a lot higher video resolution.
Moto G Stylus's memory for games and applications is just as good as Galaxy A7 (2018)'s one, both of them have a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and exactly the same 128 GB internal storage. The Moto G Stylus features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.