Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-20 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2018) has a score of 84.2, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 overall score. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy A7 (2018) is incredibly older than OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's body is somewhat lighter and a little thinner. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3216px, a greater pixel number per inch of screen and a quite larger display.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) has slightly more storage capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a lot better camera than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light images, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a much larger camera sensor and a back camera with much more megapixels. OPPO Find X3 Pro has improved battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.