Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2018) is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a global score of 84.2 against 77.8. Galaxy A7 (2018)'s body is extremely lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is notably thicker and was released 6 years before. The Galaxy A7 (2018) has an extremely better processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better screen than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a lot larger display, a much better 2200 x 2480px resolution and a just a little more pixels per screen inch. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery life than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 73 percent more battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photos and videos, a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.