Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-20 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2018) is a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, having an 84.2 score against 78.8. Galaxy A7 (2018) is a a little lighter device than vivo X60 Pro, but they are 0.3inches thick. The vivo X60 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a little bit lower count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2376.
The vivo X60 Pro features just a little better processing power than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a camera with a lot higher resolution, a lot larger sensor taking much better quality videos and photos and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Galaxy A7 (2018) features a bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. Vivo X60 Pro counts with superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 4200mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.